Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/topgsnkq/public_html/nurselite.com/wp-content/themes/enfold/framework/php/function-set-avia-frontend.php on line 637
Test 1 Part 2 QuestionsFor the following questions, I expect 3 or more paragraphs for each response. Your answers should reflect awareness of the assigned reading, the instructor’s lectures, the weekly discussions and your own ideas. Remember, I expect to see your original thought. I only want you to use the sources listed above and your own ideas (I don’t want you to search for other sources).1) How can a person be happy? Explain what Aristotle thinks happiness consists in, and how one can be happy. Differentiate primary and secondary goods. Do you think Aristotle is correct about primary goods? Why? In the Myth of Gyges Plato implies something troubling about happiness. What is this implication? Is it inconsistent with Aristotle’s thoughts on happiness? Explain.2) In John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty, an argument is made in favor of freedom of expression. Explain Mill’s reasons for encouraging freedom of expression, and also explain the objections to freedom of expression implied by Plato’s Ship of Fools. Do you think we should be allowed to express ourselves as we wish? What might go wrong?3) Imagine you are able to save many people by causing harm to one person, as in the Trolley Problem. Is it morally better to save many or to remain uninvolved? Make an argument defending a course of action and explain why your assignment help recommended course of action is morally best. How should one decide what the best course of action is?4) Differentiate how a consequentialist and a deontologist might think about the morality of lying. Is it wrong to lie, or might it be acceptable? Why? Which of these perspectives do you most agree with?Format: APANumber of pages: 1 Double spacedType of work: Writing from scratchType of work: Case studySources needed: 3Subject: NursingTopic: Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault: JessicaAcademic Level: BachelorDetailsInstructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide rationales for your answers. Make sure to provide citations/references for your answers in APA format.Sexual assault includes any type of sexual activity to which an individual does not agree. Because of the effects of some drugs, commonly called date rape drugs, victims may be physically helpless, unable to refuse, or even unable to remember what happened for help with writing. Jessica, a 16-year-old high school sophomore, expresses concern to the school nurse practitioner that she knows someone who might have had sex “without knowing it.” How can the nurse practitioner answer these common questions?Reflective QuestionsWhat are date rape drugs and how can a person be unaware that such a drug has been ingested?What can you do to protect yourself?What do you do if you think you have been sexually assaulted?What can you do when someone you care about has been sexually assaulted?What role does a nurse practitioner play in the care of sexually assaulted patients, particularly in the adolescent age group?Your first work is a rhetorical analysis worth 15%. The purpose of such work is to analyze an work or speech by breaking it in various parts and discussing how rhetorical tools are used for effective communication. You can choose to examine the three cornerstones of a rhetorical exercise: ethos, logos and pathos. You may also opt to look at additional rhetorical devices such as allusions, analogies, figures of speech (i.e. metaphors and similes etc) if you believe the author makes effective use of them in his/her work. The work should be 2 ½ to 3 pages. You will not take sides on the issue that the speaker is writing on; you will not summarize it or consult other sources. You will only analyze it. Be sure to use MLA guidelines in formatting your work and observing in-text citation. There is no need for a works cited page. A draft and peer review are due on Thursday, Sept 16 (you will do the peer review with a group member as assignment (or class work if class time permits) and the final is due Monday, Sept. 20th.These is the list of work/speeches for the assignment. Choose one.1. “Speech Delivered at the Cotton States and International Exposition” by Booker T. Washington p. 472. “Truth: Remarks on the Removal of Confederate Monuments in New Orleans” by Mitch Landrieu p. 4343. “The First White President” by Ta-Nehisi Coates p. 3414. “The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action” by Audre Lorde p. 1885. “Hip Hop’s Lil Sisters Speak” by Bettina Love p. 2886. “School Segregation: The Continuing Tragedy of Ferguson” by Nikole Hannah-Jones p. 381Video Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAXMCtDY-Fo ___________________________________________Below is information to guide you to write the introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion of the rhetorical analysis from writing service. There is a link below that takes you directly to the same information on the web.How to Write a Rhetorical Analysis. Break down the work into its basic outline, which is the purpose of the piece, the appeals, evidence and techniques used. Next, break down the examples of appeals, evidence and techniques and finally offer an explanation of why they worked or did not in your opinion.Find below the link and a clear example of the structure of the rhetorical analysis.Sample Intro:Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech is widely regarded as one of the most important pieces of oratory in American history. Delivered in 1963 to thousands of civil rights activists outside the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., the speech has come to symbolize the spirit of the civil rights movement and even to function as a major part of the American national myth for this https://anyessayhelp.com/assignment-and-homework-help/. This rhetorical analysis argues that King’s assumption of the prophetic voice, amplified by the historic size of his audience, creates a powerful sense of ethos that has retained its inspirational power over the years.The body: Doing the analysisThebodyof your rhetorical analysis is where you’ll tackle the text directly. It’s often divided into three paragraphs, although it may be more in a longer work.Eachparagraphshould focus on a different element of the text, and they should all contribute to your overall argument for your thesis statement.Below is a sample body paragraph. Hover over the example to explore how a typical body paragraph is constructed.King’s speech is infused with prophetic language throughout. Even before the famous “dream” part of the speech, King’s language consistently strikes a prophetic tone. He refers to the Lincoln Memorial as a “hallowed spot” and speaks of rising “from the dark and desolate valley of segregation” to “make justice a reality for all of God’s children.” The assumption of this prophetic voice constitutes the text’s strongest ethical appeal; after linking himself with political figures like Lincoln and the Founding Fathers, King’s ethos adopts a distinctly religious tone, recalling Biblical prophets and preachers of change from across history. This adds significant force to his words; standing before an audience of hundreds of thousands, he states not just what the future should be, but what it will be: “The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.” This warning is almost apocalyptic in tone, though it concludes with the positive image of the “bright day of justice.” The power of King’s rhetoric thus stems not only from the pathos of his vision of a brighter future, but from the ethos of the prophetic voice he adopts in expressing this vision.Concluding a rhetorical analysisThe conclusion of a rhetorical analysis wraps up the work by restating the main argument and showing how it has been developed by your analysis as at https://onlyessayhelp.com/assignment-and-homework-help/. It may also try to link the text, and your analysis of it, with broader concerns.Sample conclusion below: Explore the example below to get a sense of the conclusion.It is clear from this analysis that the effectiveness of King’s rhetoric stems less from the pathetic appeal of his utopian “dream” than it does from the ethos he carefully constructs to give force to his statements. By framing contemporary upheavals as part of a prophecy whose fulfillment will result in the better future he imagines, King ensures not only the effectiveness of his words in the moment but their continuing resonance today. Even if we have not yet achieved King’s dream, we cannot deny the role his words played in setting us on the path toward it.