Interdisciplinary management
Topic regarding Lucid Robotic Transcranial Doppler
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
comment from post 4
Imago dei, or “image of God” is fundamental in Christian nursing. “The Christian understanding of human beings as created in the image of God bestows dignity and honor on every person, regardless of social, mental or physical status,” (Shelly & Miller, 2006, 76). The postmodern viewpoint, on the other hand, has a different viewpoint on humanity. We are part of a living Earth, with our human life being no more valuable than an inanimate object (a rock) or an animal such as a cat or a dog (Shelly & Miller, 2006, 76). Why does this matter? Our love of our God drives us to care for others, for each person represents the face of God and His love for us. This love and humanity bestowed on each person creates dignity and respect for all people. It forms the bedrock of our call to duty as nurses. The postmodern viewpoint strips this from our nursing toolbox. If people are no more valuable than rocks or pets, then how do we care for the sick, handicapped, or dying if they don’t matter? “Whenever a society ceased to recognize the image of God in human beings, whether in the name of science, political ideology, religion or simply greed, serious moral decay soon followed. We have only to look at the Nazi Holocaust, the decline of compassionate healthcare under the Communist regimes and our own profit-driven health care system for vivid illustrations,” (Shelly & Miller, 2006, 76).I NEED YOU TO COMMENT FROM THIS POST, 150 WORDS NEEDED AND A REFERENCE PLEASE
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
Magz64 only
This assignment builds on the Risk Management Program Analysis Part One assignment you completed in Topic 1 of this course.Assume that the example risk management program you analyzed in Topic 1 was developed by and is now currently implemented by your health care employer/organization. Further assume that your supervisor has asked you to present a high-level summary brief of this new risk management program to a group of administrative personnel from a newly created community health organization in your state who has enlisted your organization’s assistance in developing their own risk management policies and procedures.Compose a 1,250-1,500 word summary brief that expands upon the elements you addressed in the Risk Management Program Analysis Part One assignment. In addition, analyze the following:Explain the Joint Commission’s role in the evaluation of an organization’s quality management processes.Describe the roles that different levels of administrative personnel play in establishing or sustaining operational policies that are focused on employer-employee organizational risk management policies.Explain the relationship of risk management programs and compliance with ethical standards.In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with a minimum of three peer-reviewed references.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
ethical dilemma
Describe a situation of ethical dilemma that you have experienced in practice and how it was resolved. (Saunders, 2014)Submission Instructions:Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
1. The patient was treated on an outpatient basis for both acute and chronic bronchitis, for which each was assigned an ICD-10-CM diagnosis code. First-listed diagnosis: 22. The patient was treated for acne in the physician’s office during this vi
1. The patient was treated on an outpatient basis for both acute and chronic bronchitis, for which each was assigned an ICD-10-CM diagnosis code.First-listed diagnosis:22. The patient was treated for acne in the physician’s office during this visit. The physician also documented that his previously diagnosed hives had totally resolved.First-listed diagnosis:23. The patient was seen for complaints of fainting accompanied by nausea and vomiting. Her blood was drawn and sent to the lab to have a blood glucose level performed. Lab results were normal. The patient was scheduled for outpatient testing to rule out seizure disorder.First-listed diagnosis:24. The patient underwent outpatient radiation therapy for treatment of prostate cancer during today’s encounter; the patient had previously complained of painful urination.First-listed diagnosis:25. The patient’s preoperative diagnosis was possible appendicitis and right lower quadrant pain; he underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. The postoperative diagnosis was acute appendicitis.First-listed diagnosis:
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
Family Health – Week 1 Discussion 2nd REPLY
Please reply to the following discussion with one or more references. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite resources in your responses to other classmates.Discussion attachedThanks
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
DSLP-1
Note:I need full 2-3 pages paper on the following instructions. Please carefully provide full 2-3 pages answer. Include headings prior describing each new section. Must include 3-4 reference sources from credible professional and scholarly publications and cited in APA. Your answer must be 100% original.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
Pecha Kucha
Pecha Kucha is a presentation style in which 20 slides are shown for 20 seconds each (6 minutes and 40 seconds in total).a Pecha Kucha presentation based on the chosen theme and issue(s) discussed in their Final Project Product Proposal, providing images on each slide to support the narrative of the presentation.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
ASSIGNMENT1 W3
Use the practice problem and a quantitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.RUBRICSRough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less than Satisfactory75.00%3Satisfactory83.00%4Good94.00%5Excellent100.00%75.0 %Content15.0 % Background of StudyBackground of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.15.0 % Method of StudyDiscussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.15.0 % Results of StudyDiscussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.15.0 % Ethical ConsiderationsDiscussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.15.0 % ConclusionConclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness5.0 % Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.5.0 % Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 % Total Weightage
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
Case study part II 8 pages apa seven references less than five years
Attached All instructionsPart I attached
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
WE ACCEPT
Make your payment through either:
